|Titre||Controls on the siting and style of volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits|
|Auteur||Tornos, F; Peter, J M; Allen, R; Conde, C|
|Source||Ore Geology Reviews vol. 68, 2015 p. 142-163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.01.003|
|Séries alt.||Secteur des sciences de la Terre, Contribution externe 20140142|
|Document||publication en série|
|Media||papier; en ligne; numérique|
|Sujets||gîtes sulfureux; gisements de métaux de base; gîtes volcanogènes; gisements stratiformes; gisements filoniens; gisements minéraux hydrothermaux; cuivre; zinc; or; argent; plomb; minéralisation;
métallogénie; minéraux métalliques|
|Programme||Étude des gîtes de sulfures massifs volcaniques, Initiative géoscientifique ciblée (IGC-4)|
|Résumé||(disponible en anglais seulement)|
Volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) deposits form in subaqueous environments from circulating hydrothermal fluids heated by volcanic activity. These deposits
form as sulphide mounds, stratiform exhalative and/or replacive bodies and commonly have stockwork/vein mineralization in their immediate footwall. These various "styles" are essentially facies of mineralization, each one being the product of a
particular set of conditions that control the ore-forming processes and the consequent geometry and architecture (style) of the deposits. These controls include the physical and/or chemical nature of the host rocks, the temperature and composition of
the hydrothermal fluids and the redox state of the depositional environment.
The style of exhalative deposits is controlled by the salinity of the vented fluids and the redox state at the seafloor. Hydrothermal fluids with salinities less than
twice that of seawater that vented into open, oxic oceanic environments, typically formed small mound and chimney complexes, unless theywere rapidly covered by sediments or volcanic rocks. The massive sulphides were rapidly oxidized and partly
dissolved by seawater. In contrast, stratiform sheet-like deposits are typically formed in anoxic bottom waters. Anoxic marine conditions were periodically of global extent – particularly prior to 2.4 Ga – or of a regional nature. Local anoxic
conditions can also be self-induced by the exhalation of saline and reducing hydrothermal fluids that ponded in bathymetric depressions such as second- or third-order basins to form a brine pool. These exhalative systems may have been initiated as
chimney vent complexes and subsequently overlain by stratiform sulphides formed under the selfinduced anoxic conditions. Deposits formed in anoxic environments can be significantly larger than those in oxic settings, and this is attributed to several
factors that include longer-lived hydrothermal circulation, more efficient sulphide precipitation and reduced or inhibited oxidation thereof.
Replacement of volcanic and sedimentary strata by sulphide typically occurs within the feeder zones
beneath the exhalative mineralization. However, successionswith abundant porous, permeable and/or reactive rocks such as glassy and/or pumiceous volcaniclastic rocks, and in some cases limestone, favoured the development of large replacive deposits,
that may have had little surficial expression on the sea floor.
VMS deposits at spreading centreswithin oceanic crust formed almost exclusively asmounds.Most of them have not been preserved, likely due to oxidation of the sulphides in the
prevailing oxic environment and/or destruction of oceanic crust during subsequent subduction. Intra-continental rifts, arc rifts and back-arc rifts commonly have more complexity in their structure, and facies architecture and environments and can
host all styles of VMS mineralization. In these settings, early extension favoured the formation of restricted basinswith ideal conditions for the onset of hydrothermal activity and development of anoxic bottom waters, whereas in mature rifts the
conditions were less conducive for the formation of regionally extensive anoxic environments. Formation of replacive deposits was permissible in all settings with porous or reactive subsea-floor strata. Replacive mineralization is the most likely to
be preserved in the geological record due to the sulphides being physically shielded from oxidative weathering and mechanical erosion at the seafloor.
The various styles of VMS mineralization can rarely be distinguished using a single criterion;
in most cases multiple criteria are required.
Mound style mineralization is distinguished by: (a) mound- or lens-shaped morphology; (b) presence of chimney fragments; (c) presence of abundant sedimented sulphide breccias; (d) location on a
stratigraphic boundary (ore horizon); and (e) associationwith a thin horizon or thicker stratigraphic interval of fine-grained clastic rocks (e.g., shale, mudstone) that accumulated at slow sedimentation rates.
Stratiform exhalative mineralization
is distinguished by: (a) sheet-like morphology prior to deformation; (b) presence of fine-grained clastic host rocks that accumulated at relatively slow rates (e.g., mudstone); (c) presence of local or extensive planar stratification.
mineralization is characterized by: (a) irregular geometry and distribution of sulphide bodies; (b) gradation from massive sulphides to semi-massive sulphides and disseminated mineralization with relict textures of the host rock; and (c) originally
pumiceous, glassy or reactive host rocks emplaced at high depositional rates (mass flow deposits, lavas, carbonate-altered mass flow deposits) or limestone.
One deposit or district may comprise two or more of these main styles of mineralization.
In many cases the main styles of VMS mineralization present in a particular region can be predicted fromexamination of the facies architecture and depositional environments of the host succession. Recognition of the style(s) of mineralization that
occur in a particular basin or mineral belt enables exploration models to be improved and should influence the strategy of exploration for VMS deposits.
|Résumé||(Résumé en langage clair et simple, non publié)|
L'Initiative géoscientifique ciblée (IGC-4) est un programme géoscientifique fédéral de collaboration qui fournit à l'industrie les connaissances
géoscientifiques et les techniques novatrices de prochaine génération dont elle a besoin pour mieux détecter les gîtes minéraux enfouis, réduisant ainsi certains risques liés à l'exploration. La majeure partie du zinc et du plomb du Canada, ainsi
qu'environ un quart de son cuivre, sont exploités dans des gisements de sulfures massifs volcanogènes (SMV), lesquels sont également une importante source d'or, d'argent et d'autres métaux récupérés comme sous-produits. La nature polymétallique des
gisements de SMV en fait des cibles d'exploration très recherchées puisque, sur le plan économique, la production risque beaucoup moins d'être touchée par la fluctuation des prix des métaux. La reconnaissance du ou des styles de minéralisation
présents dans un bassin particulier ou une ceinture minéralisée permet d'améliorer les modèles d'exploration et devrait influer sur la stratégie d'exploration visant la découverte de nouveaux gisements.