GEOSCAN, résultats de la recherche


TitreAn orientation study of the heavy mineral signature of the NICO Co-Au-Bi deposit, Great Bear magmatic zone, NW Territories, Canada
AuteurMcMartin, I; Corriveau, L; Beaudoin, G
SourceGeochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis vol. 11, 2011 p. 293-307,
Séries alt.Secteur des sciences de la Terre, Contribution externe 20090365
Documentpublication en série
Mediapapier; en ligne; numérique
ProvinceTerritoires du Nord-Ouest
SNRC85N; 86C; 86D; 86E; 86F; 86K; 86L
Lat/Long OENS-119.0000 -116.0000 67.0000 63.0000
Sujetsgîtes minéralogiques; cobalt; or; bismuth; cuivre; minéraux lourds; analyses des minéraux lourds; géochimie des minéraux lourds; magnetite; Zone de Great Bear Magmatic ; Dépôt de Nico ; Dépôt de Sue-dianne ; géochimie; géologie économique
Illustrationslocation maps; tables; photomicrographs; plots
ProgrammeGisements polymétalliques - Zone magmatique du Grand lac de l'Ours (T.N-O.), GEM : La géocartographie de l'énergie et des minéraux
Diffusé2011 12 07
Résumé(disponible en anglais seulement)
An orientation study around the NICO Co-Au-Bi deposit in the Great Bear magmatic zone of NW Territories, Canada, was initiated in 2007 to establish a practical guide to geochemical and mineralogical exploration for iron oxide coppergold deposits in glaciated terrain. Bedrock and till samples were collected up-ice, proximal and down-ice from mineralization and host rocks, to characterize their indicator mineral signatures. Results demonstrate that gold grain abundance, size and shape, as well as magnetite and hematite composition, have the best potential to fingerprint the mineralization at NICO. Pristine-shaped gold grains indicative of a local bedrock source and a short distance of glacial transport are relatively abundant in till samples collected immediately down-ice from several mineral occurrences at NICO and none were recovered up-ice. Iron oxide composition using preliminary discriminant diagrams shows some potential, using Ni/(Mn+Cr) versus Ti+V plots. In particular, magnetite and hematite from till samples collected over, or directly down-ice of, the NICO deposit have lower Ti+V compositions compared to magnetite and hematite from till collected up-ice from mineralization. Potential non-ferromagnetic indicator minerals are either not chemically stable in surface sediments (arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrite), not sufficiently coarse-grained or resistant to glacial transport (bismuthinite, tourmaline, ferroactinolite), not abundant enough in the mineralized bedrock (scheelite, molybdenite, cobaltite, allanite), or not sufficiently heavy (tourmaline) to be useful at NICO but may be at other deposits in the region or elsewhere in glaciated terrain. The development of indicator mineral methods, together with till geochemistry, will be tested with further sampling over the Great Bear magmatic zone.