GEOSCAN, résultats de la recherche

Menu GEOSCAN


TitreCo-seismic and post-seismic pore-fluid pressure changes in the Philippine Sea plate and Nankai decollement in response to a seismogenic strain event off Kii Peninsula, Japan
AuteurDavis, E; Becker, K; Wang, K; Kinoshita, M
SourceEarth, Planets and Space vol. 61, 2009 p. 649-657, https://doi.org/10.1186/bf03353174 (Accès ouvert)
Année2009
Séries alt.Secteur des sciences de la Terre, Contribution externe 20080585
ÉditeurSpringer Nature
Documentpublication en série
Lang.anglais
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/bf03353174
Mediapapier; en ligne; numérique
Formatspdf
Lat/Long OENS133.0000 138.0000 34.5000 31.0000
Sujetsinterprétations tectoniques; cadre tectonique; fluides des pores; pressions interstitielles; séismologie; déformation; tectonique; géologie marine
Illustrationslocation maps; profiles; graphs; cross-sections; plots
ProgrammeRéduction des risques dus aux aléas naturels
Diffusé2009 07 27
Résumé(disponible en anglais seulement)
New pressure data from a pair of Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) hydrologic borehole observatories at ODP Sites 1173 and 808, located off Japan in the subducting Philippine Sea plate and in the nearby Nankai accretionary prism, respectively, show clear signals associated with an earthquake swarm off the Kii Peninsula that began on September 5, 2004, roughly 220 km away from the observatory sites. At Site 1173, formation pressures rose by 1.0 - 1.5 kPa at the time of the largest earthquake (Mw = 7.5), then continued to rise to a total anomaly of 4 kPa during the following 200 - 300 days. These transients are inferred to reflect co-seismic and slow continuing volumetric contraction of the plate by amounts of roughly 0.2 × 10-6 and 0.5 × 10-6, respectively. The sign of the estimated strain is consistent with that predicted with a seismic-moment-constrained elastic half-space dislocation model, but the amplitude is much larger, by roughly a factor of 6 at the time of the main earthquake, and by nearly a factor of 20 when the total pressure-estimated strain at the end of the post-seismic period is compared to that estimated from the total cumulative seismic moment including aftershocks. The simplest inference that can be drawn is that a large component of aseismic slip occurred in the epicentral area. At Site 808, pressure at the deepest monitoring zone just above the subduction decollement fell at the time of the largest earthquakes. This may reflect shear-induced dilatation which would be consistent with strain- or velocityhardening behaviour along this seaward-most part of the subduction thrust interface.
GEOSCAN ID226270