GEOSCAN Search Results: Fastlink


TitleOcean loading effects on the prediction of Antarctic glacial isostatic uplift and gravity rates
AuthorSimon, K M; James, T S; Ivins, E R
SourceJournal of Geodesy 2010, 13 pages,
Alt SeriesEarth Sciences Sector, Contribution Series 20090174
PublisherSpringer Nature
Mediaon-line; digital
File formatpdf
Lat/Long WENS-180.0000 180.0000 -60.0000 -90.0000
Subjectsgeophysics; surficial geology/geomorphology; Nature and Environment; crustal uplift; gravity; crustal movements; sea level fluctuations; sea level changes; ice thickness; glaciation; global positioning system
Illustrationssketch maps; cross-sections; formulae
Released2010 02 12
AbstractThe effect of regional ocean loading on predicted rates of crustal uplift and gravitational change due to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) is determined for Antarctica. The effect is found to be significant for the ICE-3G and ICE-5G loading histories (up to -8 mm/year and -3 mm/year change in uplift rate and -3 cm/year and -1 cm/year equivalent water height change (EWHC) of surface mass, respectively). The effect is smaller (+1 mm/year; +0.25 cm/year) for the IJ05 loading history. The impact of ocean loading on the rate of change of the long-wavelength zonal harmonics of the Earth's gravitational field is also significantly smaller for IJ05 than ICE-3G. A simple analytical formula is derived that is accurate to about 3% in a root-mean-square sense that relates predicted or observed gravitational change at the surface of the Earth (r = a) to the EWHC. A fundamental difference in the definition of the load histories accounts for the differing sensitivities to ocean loading. IJ05 defines its surface load history relative to the present-day surface load, rather than specifying an absolute loading history, and thus implicitly approximates the temporal and spatial mass exchange between grounded ice and open ocean. In contrast, ICE-3G and ICE-5G specify an absolute load history and explicit regional ocean loading substantially perturbs predicted GIA rates. Conclusions of previous studies that used IJ05 predictions without ocean loading are relatively robust.