| Title | Landsat-7 ETM+ radiometric normalization comparison for northern mapping applications |
| |
| Author | Olthof, I; Pouliot, D; Fernandes, R ; Latifovic, R |
| Source | Remote Sensing of Environment vol. 95, no. 3, 2005 p. 388-398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.024 |
| Year | 2005 |
| Alt Series | Earth Sciences Sector, Contribution Series 2005306 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV |
| Document | serial |
| Lang. | English |
| Media | paper; on-line; digital |
| File format | pdf |
| Subjects | geophysics; remote sensing; LANDSAT; LANDSAT imagery |
| Released | 2005 04 01 |
| Abstract | Relative radiometric normalization has long been performed to generate consistency among individual Landsat scenes for production of composites containing multiple scenes. Normalization methods have
relied on matching identical and assumed invariant features in both images of an overlapping pair, or on invariant targets that are not necessarily the same features. Problems with overlap normalization methods include sensitivity to outliers in
overlap data caused by atmospheric or land cover change between scenes, which can lead to radiometric error propagation across a mosaic caused by a normalized scene becoming a reference for the subsequent scene entered into the mosaic. Solutions to
such problems include interactive outlier removal to generate a normalization function using a 'no change' data set and methods that are robust against outliers to automatically generate normalization functions with minimal user input. This paper
compares two normalization methods that use a robust regression technique called Theil-Sen with an established overlap normalization method. The first method uses Theil-Sen regression to generate a normalization function between overlap regions,
while the second uses Theil-Sen to normalize to coarse-resolution composite reflectance data from the SPOT VEGETATION (VGT) sensor. The results of the normalizations were evaluated in two ways: (1) using statistics generated between overlap regions;
and (2) separately using coarse-resolution data as a reference. Both overlap normalization methods performed almost identically; however, Theil-Sen was faster and easier to implement than its traditional counterpart due to its insensitivity to
outliers and capability for full automation. While overlap and coarse-resolution normalizations each outperformed the other when evaluated against its calibration set, error propagation caused by outliers in overlap samples was avoided in the
normalization to coarse-resolution imagery. Advantages offered by normalization to coarse-resolution data using robust regression, including full automation, make this method particularly attractive for generation of large area mosaics containing 100
Landsat scenes or more. |
| GEOSCAN ID | 221114 |
|
|