GEOSCAN Search Results: Fastlink

GEOSCAN Menu


TitleGeological comparison between east European and Canadian uranium deposits
DownloadDownloads
 
LicencePlease note the adoption of the Open Government Licence - Canada supersedes any previous licences.
AuthorRuzicka, V
SourceGeological Survey of Canada, Paper 70-48, 1971, 196 pages (7 sheets), https://doi.org/10.4095/102392 Open Access logo Open Access
Year1971
PublisherCanada Department of Energy, Mines and Resources
Documentserial
Lang.English
Mediapaper; on-line; digital
File formatpdf
ProvinceBritish Columbia; Alberta; Saskatchewan; Manitoba; Ontario; Quebec; New Brunswick; Nova Scotia; Prince Edward Island; Newfoundland and Labrador; Northwest Territories; Yukon; Nunavut; Canada
NTS1; 2; 3; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 20; 21; 22; 23; 24; 25; 26; 27; 28; 29; 30; 31; 32; 33; 34; 35; 36; 37; 38; 39; 40; 41; 42; 43; 44; 45; 46; 47; 48; 49; 52; 53; 54; 55; 56; 57; 58; 59; 62; 63; 64; 65; 66; 67; 68; 69; 72; 73; 74; 75; 76; 77; 78; 79; 82; 83; 84; 85; 86; 87; 88; 89; 92; 93; 94; 95; 96; 97; 98; 99; 102; 103; 104; 105; 106; 107; 114O; 114P; 115; 116; 117; 120; 340; 560
AreaMakkovik; Inda Lake; Canada; Czechia; Czechoslovakia; Ussr
Lat/Long WENS 12.0000 23.0000 51.0000 47.0000
Subjectseconomic geology; industrial minerals; structural geology; aluminum geochemistry; barium geochemistry; beryllium geochemistry; bismuth geochemistry; boron geochemistry; calcium geochemistry; cesium geochemistry; chromium geochemistry; cobalt geochemistry; copper geochemistry; iron geochemistry; lanthanum geochemistry; lead geochemistry; magnesium geochemistry; manganese geochemistry; mining properties; molybdenum geochemistry; nickel geochemistry; ore mineral genesis; paragenesis; silicon geochemistry; spectrographic analyses; thorium geochemistry; titanium geochemistry; vanadium geochemistry; yttrium geochemistry; zirconium geochemistry; ytterbium geochemistry; uranium geochemistry; tin geochemistry; strontium geochemistry; silver geochemistry; scandium geochemistry; niobium
Illustrationscross-sections
Released1971 01 01; 2015 09 03
AbstractThe comparison of some geological features between the Canadian and East European (including the Asian part of U. S.S. R.) uranium deposits and types of deposits show many similarities, e.g. the deposits were formed during analogous mineragenetic processes, they were related to certain orogenies and to certain phases of the tectonic cycles in specific geological conditions .
The distribution of the endogenetic uranium deposits is structurally controlled by regional deep fault and fracture systems, along which the tectonic movements were repeated several times. The intersections and ramifications of such systems are the favourable loci for uranium deposits, if other favourable conditions are pre sent.
Favourable lithological features of sedimentary rocks within the uranium-bearing areas and provinces influenced the localization of uranium mineralization in the sedimentary syngenetic deposits or in the epigenetic deposits in sediments.
The syngeneic differentiation and accumulation of uranium caused the primary enrichment of rocks with uranium.
Weathering processes, which affected the uranium enriched rocks, separated the uranium compounds and introduced them either as a part of weathered material into the detritus or into the hydrological cycle.
Metamorphic processes an ls o participated in differentiation and accumulation of uranium.
Comparison of some geological features of uranium deposits from different geological environments as well as the hitherto published classifications of uranium deposits allowed a new classification of uranium deposits into several syngeneic, metamorphic and epigenetic groups and various types within them.
GEOSCAN ID102392

 
Date modified: